The Truth will prevail, but only if we demand it from Congress!

9-11 Inside Job and Neocons Hacked 2004


Home ] 9-11 Inside Job ] Federal Reserve ] Hacking Elections ] Iraq War ] Fake War on Terror ] New World Order ] Media ] Peak Oil-Petro Euros ] Fascism in U.S. ] Editorials ] About Us ] Links ] Contact Us ]



9-11-01 ARTICLE 12



What Really Happened? Fifteen minutes (8:14am) after leaving Boston, American Airlines Flight 11

(AA11) failed to respond to FAA ground control. Six minutes (8:22am)

later and well off-course, a flight attendant reported the aircraft had

been hijacked. In seven minutes (8:28am), the plane was heading to

New York City (NYC), where it crashed into World Trade Center North

(WTC-1) at 8:46am. Impact occurred 32 minutes after AA11 had been

presumed hijacked and 25 minutes after the plane was known to have

definitely been hijacked.

If standard Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) operating procedures

been followed, AA11 would have been intercepted by F-15 fighter

jets within 10 minutes and no later than 8:30am. If FAA regulations been

followed, the flight controller would have implemented emergency procedures

at 8:14am when radio contact had been lost. The National Military

Command Center (NMCC) and North American Aerospace Defense

Command (NORAD) would have immediately "scrambled" from the

nearest airport.

F-15s should have intercepted

AA11 sixteen minutes

before it crashed into WTC-1.

Normally when a plane goes offcourse

by even 2 miles, there is an "emergency". Upon interception the

plane would have submitted to being escorted or been shot down. Interception

of off-course aircraft occurs on average 100 times every year.

On September 11, 2001, AA11 was not intercepted. Why?

According to the official story, at 8:46, when WTC-1 was hit, a

full six minutes after notification, two F-15s were "scrambled" from

remote locations and were still 70 miles away when WTC-2 was hit at

9:03am. Normally, F-15s can go from "scramble" to 2,900 feet in 2.5

minutes and then can fly at 1,850 nmph (nautical miles per hour) and

should have intercepted AA11

by 8:24 – at the very least by

8:30, a full 16 minutes before

striking WTC-1.

With the A11 hijacking in

already in progress, American

Airlines Flight 175 (AA175) left

Boston at 8:14am. Contact was

lost at 8:42am as it went offcourse.

NORAD was notified at 8:43am, three minutes before A11 hit

WTC-1. Like AA11, AA175 was not intercepted and it impacted WTC South

(WTC-2) at 9:03am. During the 17 minutes between crashes, the people

in WTC-2 were repeatedly – right up to the last few minutes – told not

to evacuate the building. If standard operating procedures been followed

this second plane should have been intercepted or shot down

by 8:53am.

There is no credible explanation for NORAD’s late response. Other

official explanations were that no jets were "scrambled" for a full hour

(only after the Pentagon was hit). Why was neither FAA nor NORAD held

responsible for their failure to respond to the A11 and A175 hijackings

on 9-11? Were they just following orders to "stand-down"? Who ensured

that standard procedures for emergency response were not followed on

September 11, 2001?

Failure of Emergency Standard Operating Procedures!


Inexplicable Explosive Collapse of WTC Twin Towers!

WTC-1 was hit at 8:46am and collapsed at 10:28am (1 hour and 45 minutes

later). WTC-2 was hit at 9:03am and collapsed at 9:59 (56 minutes

later). Why did WTC-2 collapse twenty-nine minutes sooner than WTC-1?

Jet fuel is capable of igniting fires at a maximum of 1,600-1,700°F.

To melt steel, temperatures of 2,770°F are required. That fires from

jet fuel could have ignited fires capable of collapsing WTC buildings is

impossible according to science. WTC fires were not sufficiently hot, widespread

and burning long-enough to have been capable of collapsing

these buildings. The fire in WTC-2 was actually much smaller than the

WTC-1 fire and yet WTC-2 was the first to collapse. Prior to 9-11 a steelframed

building had never before collapsed solely due to fire.

According to Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), the

towers were "complex and substantially

more redundant than

typical." The quality of the steel

in the towers exceeded standard

requirements. Within seconds of

impact both towers were stable.

No official explanation of the

total collapse of WTC towers

is credible. Even if the "pancake"

theory were true – even if

damage from impact and fire on

the upper floors were believable 9:59AM THE LEVELING OF WORLD TRADE CENTER SOUTH (WTC-2)


Amazing Implosive Collapse of World Trade Center 7!

The collapse of the 47-story World Trade Center Building Number Seven

(WTC-7) is generally ignored because the usual-suspect stories cannot

explain away its destruction. It was 355-feet from WTC-1 and even further

from WTC-2. It was not struck by a plane. Structural damage from the planes

and their fuel was not enough to cause the two towers to collapse. How

could these planes have caused the collapse of WTC-7 at 5:20pm?

Only small fires on the 7th and 12th floors resulted from cross-over

debris. For unknown reasons the sprinkler system failed. Even had there

been raging fires, why did WTC-7 collapse when buildings with much larger

fires – WTC-4, WTC-5 and WTC-6 –did not collapse? WTC-7 would have to

be the very first steel-framed building in history to collapse solely due to

damage from fire!

There has actually been

no official explanation and

FEMA reported that even

with diesel fuel stored on

the premises of WTC-7, the

hypothesis that its ignition

could have resulted in WTC-

7’s collapse "has only a low

probability of occurrence."

The evidence again points

to a controlled demolition. But in this case, the collapse of WTC-7 began

at the base of the building and the powderized concrete remained at

ground-level. The interior collapsed first and the outside fell inward.

WTC-7 steel and other evidence was also quickly removed without even

the excuse of a search for survivors because WTC-7 had supposedly

been evacuated at 9:00am. The 23rd floor of WTC-7 was a $15-milliondollar

bunkerized Emergency Command Center supposedly abandoned

on 9-11 because it was "hit". If the officially shrugged-off WTC-7

collapse was in fact a controlled demolition, American citizens are not

unreasonable in their demand for a re-opening of the investigation to

examine the still unanswered questions about WTC-1, WTC-2, WTC-7 and

other crimes committed on September 11, 2001.

as causes for the collapse of the

towers – the central steel columns

of their lowest 20-30 floors would

have remained standing.

The only viable alternative

explanation is that WTC-2 and

WTC-1 were collapsed by controlled

demolition explosives placed

throughout the buildings prior to

the hijackings. Such a controlled

demolition is the only explanation

for the shattering of steel columns

at various levels throughout the

towers and the destruction of their steel columns at bedrock.

Controlled demolition also explains the sequence of the collapses.

The smaller fires in WTC-2 were dying down earlier than those in WTC-1.

Demolition of WTC-2 had to occur 29 minutes sooner than WTC-1 in

order to bolster the cover-up story of collapse due to fire. FEMA

reported in May 2002 that the "sequence of events leading to the collapse

of each tower could not be definitively determined." But FEMA did

not challenge the official story.

Further evidence pointing to a controlled demolition is the reduction

of over 100,000 tons of concrete in each tower to fine dust and powder.

Neither fire nor the collapse itself could have caused the powderization

of that much concrete. When the towers collapsed, they did not "pancake"

but actually exploded, with powder ejected horizontally, creating

clouds of dust three-times the width of the towers themselves. Onlclouds

of dust three-times the width of the towers themselves. Only

explosives are capable of powderizing concrete and propelling chunks

of debris 150+ feet outward. Molten steel in the tower sub-basements

also supports evidence of explosive demolition.

There is also seismic evidence for a controlled collapse pointing to

detonations occurring first on the higher and then lower floors reported

21 miles away by Columbia University Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory.

Why was debris and steel, including all the columns, beams and

trusses, removed so quickly and sold to foreign countries for recycling?

Evidence so swiftly disappeared that even according to the New York

Times, "definitive answers will never be known." Such removal and

destruction of evidence would normally be considered obstruction of

justice in the investigation of even an ordinary crime scene!





Half of New Yorkers Believe U.S. Leaders Had Foreknowledge of Impending 9/11 Attacks

and "Consciously Failed" To Act; 66% Call For New Probe of Unanswered Questions

by Congress or New York's Attorney General, New Zogby International Poll Reveals

(August 30, 2004 -- Utica, NY) On the eve of a Republican National Convention invoking 9/11 symbols, sound bytes and imagery, half (49.3%) of

New York City residents and 41% of New York citizens overall say that some of our leaders "knew in advance that attacks were planned on or around

September 11, 2001, and that they consciously failed to act," according to the poll conducted by Zogby International. The poll of New York residents

was conducted from Tuesday August 24 through Thursday August 26, 2004. Overall results have a margin of sampling error of +/-3.5.


The poll is the first of its kind conducted in America that surveys attitudes regarding US government complicity in the 9/11 tragedy. Despite the acute

legal and political implications of this accusation, nearly 30% of registered Republicans and over 38% of those who described themselves as "very

conservative" supported the claim. The charge found very high support among adults under 30 (62.8%), African-Americans (62.5%), Hispanics

(60.1%), Asians (59.4%), and "Born Again" Evangelical Christians (47.9%).

Less than two in five (36%) believe that the 9/11 Commission had "answered all the important questions about what actually happened on

September 11th," and two in three (66%) New Yorkers (and 56.2% overall) called for another full investigation of the "still unanswered questions" by

Congress or Elliot Spitzer, New York's Attorney General. Self-identified "very liberal" New Yorkers supported a new inquiry by a margin of three to

one, but so did half (53%) of "very conservative" citizens across the state. The call for a deeper probe was especially strong from Hispanics (75.6%),

African-Americans (75.3%) citizens with income from $15-25K (74.3%), women (62%) and Evangelicals (59.9%).

U.S. Congress or New York Attorney General should re-open the 9/11 investigation to

examine the still unanswered questions.

% AGREE 65.6 56.2 51.7 75.6 75.3 41.4 70.2

% DISAGREE 26.5 35.3 38.5 24.4 17.3 58.6 22.8

% NS 7.9 8.5 9.8 0.0 7.4 0.0 7.0



Total NY

residents White Hispanic African

American Asian Other

9/11 Truth

9-11 Visibility Project

NY 9/11 Truth

Citizens for Legitimate Government

Mariani vs. Bush

Family Steering Committee

International Citizens Inquiry into 911

9-11 Research

Center for Cooperative Research

9/11 Truth Press Release and Zogby International poll results continued.

W. David Kubiak, executive director of,

the group that commissioned the poll, expressed genuine

surprise that New Yorkers’ belief in the administration's

complicity is as high or higher than that seen overseas.

"We're familiar with high levels of 9/11 skepticism abroad

where there has been open debate of the evidence for US

government complicity. On May 26th the Toronto Star

reported a national poll showing that 63% of Canadians

are also convinced US leaders had ‘prior knowledge’ of

the attacks yet declined to act. There was no US coverage

of this startling poll or the facts supporting the

Canadians’conclusions, and there has been virtually no

debate on the victim families’ scores of still unanswered

questions. I think these numbers show that most New

Yorkers are now fed up with the silence, and that

politicians trying to exploit 9/11 do so at their peril. The

9/11 case is not closed and New York's questions are not

going away."

Nicholas Levis of NY 9/11 Truth, an advisor on the

poll, agrees, "The 9/11 Commission gave us a plenty of

'recommendations', but far more plentiful were the discrepancies,

gaps and omissions in their supposedly ‘final’

report. How can proposals based on such deficient

findings ever make us safe? We think these poll numbers

are basically saying, ‘Wait just a minute. What about the

scores of still outstanding questions? What about the

unexplained collapses of WTC 7, our air defenses, official

accountability, the chain of command on 9/11, the anthrax,

insider trading & FBI field probes? There's so much more

to this story that we need to know about.’ When such

a huge majority of New Yorkers want a new investigation,

it will be interesting to see how quickly Attorney

General Spitzer and our legislators respond." (Contact:, Tel. 917.295.4929)

SCOPE: The poll covered five areas of related interest:

1) Iraq--do New Yorkers think that our leaders "deliberately

misled" us before the war (51.2% do); 2) the 9/11

Commission--did it answer all the "important questions"

(only 36% said yes); 3) the inexplicable and largely

unreported collapse of the third WTC skyscraper on 9/11

--what was its number (28% of NYC area residents

knew); 4) the question on complicity; and 5) how many

wanted a new 9/11 probe. All inquiries about questions,

responses and demographics should be directed to Zogby


SPONSOR: is a coalition of researchers,

journalists and victim family members working to expose

and resolve the hundreds of critical questions still swirling

around 9/11, especially the nearly 400 questions that the

Family Steering Committee filed with the 9/11 Commission

which they fought to create. Initially welcomed by the

commissioners as a "road map" for their inquiry, these

queries cut to the heart of 9/11 crimes and accountability.

Specifically, they raised the central issues of motive,

means and cui bono (who profited?). But the Commission

ignored the majority of these questions, opting only to

explore system failures, miscommunications and incompetence.

The victim families' most incisive issues remain

unaddressed to this day. The Zogby International poll was

also cosponsored by Walden Three ( and

9/11 Citizens Watch (, a watchdog

group which has monitored the Commission since its

inception and will release its findings, "The 9/11 Omission

Report," in several weeks.

On September 9th and 11th, is cosponsoring

two large successive inquiries in New York, a

preliminary 9/11 Citizens Commission hearing and

"Confronting the Evidence: 9/11 and the Search for

Truth," a research-focused evidentiary forum. These inquiries

will examine many of the 9/11 Commission

shunned questions and discuss preparation of a probable

cause complaint demanding a grand jury and criminal

investigation from the New York Attorney General. Possible

charges range from criminal negligence and gross

dereliction of duty to foreknowledge, complicity and

subsequent obstruction of justice. For details and developments,

see For press info, contact

Kyle Hence 212-243-7787

Zogby International conducted interviews of 808 adults chosen at random in New York State. All calls were made from Zogby International headquarters in

Utica, N.Y., from August 24, 2004 through August 26, 2004. The margin of error is +/- 3.5 percentage points. Slight weights were added to region, party, age,

race, religion, and gender to more accurately reflect the population. Margins of error are higher in sub-groups.