The Truth will prevail, but only if we demand it from Congress!
9-11 Inside Job and Neocons Hacked 2004
? Fifteen minutes (8:14am) after leaving Boston, American Airlines Flight 11
(AA11) failed to respond to FAA ground control. Six minutes (8:22am)
later and well off-course, a flight attendant reported the aircraft had
been hijacked. In seven minutes (8:28am), the plane was heading to
New York City (NYC), where it crashed into World Trade Center North
(WTC-1) at 8:46am. Impact occurred 32 minutes after AA11 had been
presumed hijacked and 25 minutes after the plane was known to have
definitely been hijacked.
If standard Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) operating procedures
been followed, AA11 would have been intercepted by F-15 fighter
jets within 10 minutes and no later than 8:30am. If FAA regulations been
followed, the flight controller would have implemented emergency procedures
at 8:14am when radio contact had been lost. The National Military
Command Center (NMCC) and North American Aerospace Defense
Command (NORAD) would have immediately "scrambled" from the
F-15s should have intercepted
AA11 sixteen minutes
before it crashed into WTC-1.
Normally when a plane goes offcourse
by even 2 miles, there is an "emergency". Upon interception the
plane would have submitted to being escorted or been shot down. Interception
of off-course aircraft occurs on average 100 times every year.
On September 11, 2001, AA11 was not intercepted. Why?
According to the official story, at 8:46, when WTC-1 was hit, a
full six minutes after notification, two F-15s were "scrambled" from
remote locations and were still 70 miles away when WTC-2 was hit at
9:03am. Normally, F-15s can go from "scramble" to 2,900 feet in 2.5
minutes and then can fly at 1,850 nmph (nautical miles per hour) and
should have intercepted AA11
by 8:24 – at the very least by
8:30, a full 16 minutes before
With the A11 hijacking in
already in progress, American
Airlines Flight 175 (AA175) left
Boston at 8:14am. Contact was
lost at 8:42am as it went offcourse.
NORAD was notified at 8:43am, three minutes before A11 hit
WTC-1. Like AA11, AA175 was not intercepted and it impacted WTC South
(WTC-2) at 9:03am. During the 17 minutes between crashes, the people
in WTC-2 were repeatedly – right up to the last few minutes – told not
to evacuate the building. If standard operating procedures been followed
this second plane should have been intercepted or shot down
There is no credible explanation for NORAD’s late response. Other
official explanations were that no jets were "scrambled" for a full hour
(only after the Pentagon was hit). Why was neither FAA nor NORAD held
responsible for their failure to respond to the A11 and A175 hijackings
on 9-11? Were they just following orders to "stand-down"? Who ensured
that standard procedures for emergency response were not followed on
September 11, 2001?
Failure of Emergency Standard Operating Procedures!
F-15 FIGHTER JET
Inexplicable Explosive Collapse of WTC Twin Towers!
WTC-1 was hit at 8:46am and collapsed at 10:28am (1 hour and 45 minutes
later). WTC-2 was hit at 9:03am and collapsed at 9:59 (56 minutes
later). Why did WTC-2 collapse twenty-nine minutes sooner than WTC-1?
Jet fuel is capable of igniting fires at a maximum of 1,600-1,700°F.
To melt steel, temperatures of 2,770°F are required. That fires from
jet fuel could have ignited fires capable of collapsing WTC buildings is
impossible according to science. WTC fires were not sufficiently hot, widespread
and burning long-enough to have been capable of collapsing
these buildings. The fire in WTC-2 was actually much smaller than the
WTC-1 fire and yet WTC-2 was the first to collapse. Prior to 9-11 a steelframed
building had never before collapsed solely due to fire.
According to Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), the
towers were "complex and substantially
more redundant than
typical." The quality of the steel
in the towers exceeded standard
requirements. Within seconds of
impact both towers were stable.
No official explanation of the
total collapse of WTC towers
is credible. Even if the "pancake"
theory were true – even if
damage from impact and fire on
the upper floors were believable 9:59AM THE LEVELING OF WORLD TRADE CENTER SOUTH (WTC-2)
N O R A D
Amazing Implosive Collapse of World Trade Center 7!
The collapse of the 47-story World Trade Center Building Number Seven
(WTC-7) is generally ignored because the usual-suspect stories cannot
explain away its destruction. It was 355-feet from WTC-1 and even further
from WTC-2. It was not struck by a plane. Structural damage from the planes
and their fuel was not enough to cause the two towers to collapse. How
could these planes have caused the collapse of WTC-7 at 5:20pm?
Only small fires on the 7th and 12th floors resulted from cross-over
debris. For unknown reasons the sprinkler system failed. Even had there
been raging fires, why did WTC-7 collapse when buildings with much larger
fires – WTC-4, WTC-5 and WTC-6 –did not collapse? WTC-7 would have to
be the very first steel-framed building in history to collapse solely due to
damage from fire!
There has actually been
no official explanation and
FEMA reported that even
with diesel fuel stored on
the premises of WTC-7, the
hypothesis that its ignition
could have resulted in WTC-
7’s collapse "has only a low
probability of occurrence."
The evidence again points
to a controlled demolition. But in this case, the collapse of WTC-7 began
at the base of the building and the powderized concrete remained at
ground-level. The interior collapsed first and the outside fell inward.
WTC-7 steel and other evidence was also quickly removed without even
the excuse of a search for survivors because WTC-7 had supposedly
been evacuated at 9:00am. The 23rd floor of WTC-7 was a $15-milliondollar
bunkerized Emergency Command Center supposedly abandoned
on 9-11 because it was "hit". If the officially shrugged-off WTC-7
collapse was in fact a controlled demolition, American citizens are not
unreasonable in their demand for a re-opening of the investigation to
examine the still unanswered questions about WTC-1, WTC-2, WTC-7 and
other crimes committed on September 11, 2001.
as causes for the collapse of the
towers – the central steel columns
of their lowest 20-30 floors would
have remained standing.
The only viable alternative
explanation is that WTC-2 and
WTC-1 were collapsed by controlled
demolition explosives placed
throughout the buildings prior to
the hijackings. Such a controlled
demolition is the only explanation
for the shattering of steel columns
at various levels throughout the
towers and the destruction of their steel columns at bedrock.
Controlled demolition also explains the sequence of the collapses.
The smaller fires in WTC-2 were dying down earlier than those in WTC-1.
Demolition of WTC-2 had to occur 29 minutes sooner than WTC-1 in
order to bolster the cover-up story of collapse due to fire. FEMA
reported in May 2002 that the "sequence of events leading to the collapse
of each tower could not be definitively determined." But FEMA did
not challenge the official story.
Further evidence pointing to a controlled demolition is the reduction
of over 100,000 tons of concrete in each tower to fine dust and powder.
Neither fire nor the collapse itself could have caused the powderization
of that much concrete. When the towers collapsed, they did not "pancake"
but actually exploded, with powder ejected horizontally, creating
clouds of dust three-times the width of the towers themselves. Onlclouds
of dust three-times the width of the towers themselves. Only
explosives are capable of powderizing concrete and propelling chunks
of debris 150+ feet outward. Molten steel in the tower sub-basements
also supports evidence of explosive demolition.
There is also seismic evidence for a controlled collapse pointing to
detonations occurring first on the higher and then lower floors reported
21 miles away by Columbia University Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory.
Why was debris and steel, including all the columns, beams and
trusses, removed so quickly and sold to foreign countries for recycling?
Evidence so swiftly disappeared that even according to the New York
Times, "definitive answers will never be known." Such removal and
destruction of evidence would normally be considered obstruction of
justice in the investigation of even an ordinary crime scene!
10:28AM THE LEVELING OF WORLD TRADE CENTER NORTH (WTC-1)
5:20PM THE LEVELING OF WTC-7
WTC-7 TIDY RUBBLE SITE
STOP THE 9/11 COVER-UP
Half of New Yorkers Believe U.S. Leaders Had Foreknowledge of Impending 9/11 Attacks
and "Consciously Failed" To Act; 66% Call For New Probe of Unanswered Questions
by Congress or New York's Attorney General, New Zogby International Poll Reveals
(August 30, 2004 -- Utica, NY) On the eve of a Republican National Convention invoking 9/11 symbols, sound bytes and imagery, half (49.3%) of
New York City residents and 41% of New York citizens overall say that some of our leaders "knew in advance that attacks were planned on or around
September 11, 2001, and that they consciously failed to act," according to the poll conducted by Zogby International. The poll of New York residents
was conducted from Tuesday August 24 through Thursday August 26, 2004. Overall results have a margin of sampling error of +/-3.5.
(DOWNLOAD COMPLETE BREAKDOWN OF RESULTS HERE: http://www.911truth.org/dossier/zogby911.pdf)
The poll is the first of its kind conducted in America that surveys attitudes regarding US government complicity in the 9/11 tragedy. Despite the acute
legal and political implications of this accusation, nearly 30% of registered Republicans and over 38% of those who described themselves as "very
conservative" supported the claim. The charge found very high support among adults under 30 (62.8%), African-Americans (62.5%), Hispanics
(60.1%), Asians (59.4%), and "Born Again" Evangelical Christians (47.9%).
Less than two in five (36%) believe that the 9/11 Commission had "answered all the important questions about what actually happened on
September 11th," and two in three (66%) New Yorkers (and 56.2% overall) called for another full investigation of the "still unanswered questions" by
Congress or Elliot Spitzer, New York's Attorney General. Self-identified "very liberal" New Yorkers supported a new inquiry by a margin of three to
one, but so did half (53%) of "very conservative" citizens across the state. The call for a deeper probe was especially strong from Hispanics (75.6%),
African-Americans (75.3%) citizens with income from $15-25K (74.3%), women (62%) and Evangelicals (59.9%).
U.S. Congress or New York Attorney General should re-open the 9/11 investigation to
examine the still unanswered questions.
% AGREE 65.6 56.2 51.7 75.6 75.3 41.4 70.2
% DISAGREE 26.5 35.3 38.5 24.4 17.3 58.6 22.8
% NS 7.9 8.5 9.8 0.0 7.4 0.0 7.0
residents White Hispanic African
American Asian Other
9-11 Visibility Project
NY 9/11 Truth
Citizens for Legitimate Government
Mariani vs. Bush
Family Steering Committee
International Citizens Inquiry into 911
Center for Cooperative Research
9/11 Truth Press Release and Zogby International poll results continued.
W. David Kubiak, executive director of 911truth.org,
the group that commissioned the poll, expressed genuine
surprise that New Yorkers’ belief in the administration's
complicity is as high or higher than that seen overseas.
"We're familiar with high levels of 9/11 skepticism abroad
where there has been open debate of the evidence for US
government complicity. On May 26th the Toronto Star
reported a national poll showing that 63% of Canadians
are also convinced US leaders had ‘prior knowledge’ of
the attacks yet declined to act. There was no US coverage
of this startling poll or the facts supporting the
Canadians’conclusions, and there has been virtually no
debate on the victim families’ scores of still unanswered
questions. I think these numbers show that most New
Yorkers are now fed up with the silence, and that
politicians trying to exploit 9/11 do so at their peril. The
9/11 case is not closed and New York's questions are not
Nicholas Levis of NY 9/11 Truth, an advisor on the
poll, agrees, "The 9/11 Commission gave us a plenty of
'recommendations', but far more plentiful were the discrepancies,
gaps and omissions in their supposedly ‘final’
report. How can proposals based on such deficient
findings ever make us safe? We think these poll numbers
are basically saying, ‘Wait just a minute. What about the
scores of still outstanding questions? What about the
unexplained collapses of WTC 7, our air defenses, official
accountability, the chain of command on 9/11, the anthrax,
insider trading & FBI field probes? There's so much more
to this story that we need to know about.’ When such
a huge majority of New Yorkers want a new investigation,
it will be interesting to see how quickly Attorney
General Spitzer and our legislators respond." (Contact:
firstname.lastname@example.org, Tel. 917.295.4929)
SCOPE: The poll covered five areas of related interest:
1) Iraq--do New Yorkers think that our leaders "deliberately
misled" us before the war (51.2% do); 2) the 9/11
Commission--did it answer all the "important questions"
(only 36% said yes); 3) the inexplicable and largely
unreported collapse of the third WTC skyscraper on 9/11
--what was its number (28% of NYC area residents
knew); 4) the question on complicity; and 5) how many
wanted a new 9/11 probe. All inquiries about questions,
responses and demographics should be directed to Zogby
SPONSOR: 911truth.org is a coalition of researchers,
journalists and victim family members working to expose
and resolve the hundreds of critical questions still swirling
around 9/11, especially the nearly 400 questions that the
Family Steering Committee filed with the 9/11 Commission
which they fought to create. Initially welcomed by the
commissioners as a "road map" for their inquiry, these
queries cut to the heart of 9/11 crimes and accountability.
Specifically, they raised the central issues of motive,
means and cui bono (who profited?). But the Commission
ignored the majority of these questions, opting only to
explore system failures, miscommunications and incompetence.
The victim families' most incisive issues remain
unaddressed to this day. The Zogby International poll was
also cosponsored by Walden Three (walden3.org) and
9/11 Citizens Watch (911citizenswatch.org), a watchdog
group which has monitored the Commission since its
inception and will release its findings, "The 9/11 Omission
Report," in several weeks.
On September 9th and 11th, 911Truth.org is cosponsoring
two large successive inquiries in New York, a
preliminary 9/11 Citizens Commission hearing and
"Confronting the Evidence: 9/11 and the Search for
Truth," a research-focused evidentiary forum. These inquiries
will examine many of the 9/11 Commission
shunned questions and discuss preparation of a probable
cause complaint demanding a grand jury and criminal
investigation from the New York Attorney General. Possible
charges range from criminal negligence and gross
dereliction of duty to foreknowledge, complicity and
subsequent obstruction of justice. For details and developments,
see www.911truth.org. For press info, contact
Kyle Hence 212-243-7787 email@example.com
Zogby International conducted interviews of 808 adults chosen at random in New York State. All calls were made from Zogby International headquarters in
Utica, N.Y., from August 24, 2004 through August 26, 2004. The margin of error is +/- 3.5 percentage points. Slight weights were added to region, party, age,
race, religion, and gender to more accurately reflect the population. Margins of error are higher in sub-groups.