|Top 9-11 & Hacking Election Articles & Videos|
9-11 Mock Trial-Wing TV
|WikiLeaks is a Propaganda Front|
Selling Wikileaks, Selling Hate for America
Last week, the Department of Homeland Security seized the domain names of roughly 70 websites for copyright infringement, placing their seal as the main page. There were no warrants, no court orders, and no court hearings before a judge. The DHS simply used their authority to grab websites on the basis they are perceived threats (apparently Osama Been Deadforawhile makes a good living with bootleg DVDs).
So, if WikiLeaks is really exposing dangerous classified diplomatic cables that are a threat to the United States, why didn't DHS seize the WikiLeaks domain? Assange was dropping hints of a major leak to come. If WikiLeaks was a real whistleblower, DHS could shut them down by grabbing their domain name just as easily as it shut down the copyright violators.
But they didn't.
The dog did not bark!
WikiLeaks is a fake whistleblower, an attempt to repackage old ABCNNBBCBS lies in a new form that the public will swallow.
There is no other possible explanation for DHS not to seize the domain as a real threat, especially since Assange was not shy about dropping hints as to what was to come!
WikiLeaks is a propaganda front.
JULIAN ASSANGE, THE NEW “YASSER ARAFAT”
By Gordon Duff STAFF WRITER/Senior Editor
(With commentary by Steve Johnson)
Wikileaks has divided the world into two camps, those who love Wikileaks as a slap in the face for the United States and those who recognize the stench of Wikileaks for what it is, simple Israeli propaganda. Millions around the world look at Wikleaks as poor, harried Julian Assange and his personal struggle against the evil empire of Bush/Obama America. Hate, envy, oh, there is lots of envy here, America stimulates that with its highways filled with gas guzzling cars, eating half the world’s meat, all the best music, television and a military that scares the begeezus out of everyone. What’s not to hate?
Many American’s are buying in on this hate. Journalist Arnaud de Borchgrave calls these people “self hating Americans.” He has, at times, coined me their leader. Consider this my resignation. There is nothing in Wikileaks about fixing problems, the job honest critics of America believe in, or at least should. Wikileaks is cheap sleazy marketing, dime store junk in a shiny package.
The biggest challenge of all had to be marketing Julian Assange. Assange began life as a reputed computer hacker though never punished when caught. This is where the smell begins. Other hackers waste away in prison, not Assange. Assange seems to have a guardian angel. It didn’t take Assange long to attack the 9/11 truth movement, the single area where America and the world actually want information leaked. Getting a 9/11 leak out of Assange is not likely, not even since the rest of the world learned about building 7 being demolished by exposives.
We are all still waiting for Assange to explain his way out of that one. We didn’t know who he was protecting over 9/11. We still aren’t sure but, more and more, the Assange 9/11 denial, with the revelations about Building 7, is another smoking gun, one pointed at Wikileaks as phony, one pointing at Israel as looking more than a bit involved. Assange quickly moved on, from possible front man for the 9/11 conspirators.
Julian Assange’s next incarnation after his introduction to the world as the poor harried gay-boy, getting America’s secrets from his paramour in the Pentagon had to have a more manly edge. Assange, wicked, mysterious and somewhat sleazy and his cohort, boyish, Midwestern, obviously seduced into betraying his country wasn’t playing well, not everyone is “gay friendly.” Assange had to be repackaged for a broader demographic.
This was how it began to play out, a fiction of course, as there was never a boyfriend and there were no leaks at all. It was all an invention, a myth, cheap marketing, selling Wikileaks, building a brand for it as though it were pantyhose or a cold remedy made out of rat poison. Wikileaks was a tool, one to be taken out when needed and put away when the work is done.
The leaks themselves started as inane, then went to “youtube forgettable.” On any given day, more secret information hits the mainstream press, or the “alternative news” or, better yet, the “fringe” press, all exceeding Wikileaks, certainly in quality and substance. Wikileaks began as reprocessed new stories and chickenfeed, all “gussied up” through what is commonly called a “guerrilla marketing” program, the same way the movie Blair Witch Project was sold.
There was one catch, however. The mainstream news was all over Wikileaks, when it was nothing, when they leaked nothing, almost as though they had received orders from above to sell Wikileaks because it was going to be needed for something later.
This, in particular, made Wikileaks seem wrong. News organizations spend millions working “inside sources.” Now they are supposedly made to look like total incompetents by this “upstart” out of nowhere? Not only do they lap it up, they do it with a smile.
Shouldn’t the news have turned on Wikileaks, not just competition but debunking the press more than anything else?
This was the obvious side the news should have taken, what they should have seen, even what the alternative news should have seen in a minute but so few did. This is where it became clear. It wasn’t simply the old story of Zionist control of the press, you know the one, Jews run everything, own everything, make up the news and laugh at the rest of us, no, it wasn’t just that. It was something more simple, more basic.
THE NEW IMPROVED JULIAN ASSANGE
Wikileaks tapped into the motherload, a well of hate across Latin America, Canada, Europe, Russia, the Arab world, Paksitan and India. Countries that would incinerate each other for the fun of it all love Wikileaks.
Wikileaks sells hate. Wikileaks finds its energy by tapping into the envy the world feels for the United States and helps twist that into hate. They are doing it, not as an end in itself, but as a way allowing their sponsor, one so obvious they should be asking for credit, perhaps we could call it “Zioleaks.”
As author Jeff Gates points out, Wikileaks is simple “game theory,” an Israeli psychological operation meant to provide cover for acts of genocide they have taken part in. Gates also points out “means, motive and opportunity” as the criteria for understanding Wikileaks. These common watchwords known to any criminal investigator prove one thing, Wikileaks simply does not exist, not the cover story, not the myth.
What will a country like Israel do when it becomes public that they are stealing organs from prisoners they arrested for throwing rocks at their tanks and bulldozers. Read GiladAtzmon:
How many teenagers are being paid by Germany as holocaust survivors? One group alone conned Germany out of $42 million. http://www.haaretz.com/jewish-world/fbi-arrests-17-for-defrauding-u-s-holocaust-fund-1.323840
A country like that will stoop to anything and for Israel, a nation that has an odd history, so much to hide, so many lies, so many crimes, uncounted crimes, so many crimes that the holocaust is dragged out as a smokescreen…
Then we have the myth, Wikileaks, not selling so well as a gay pair. Assange has to be reborn, first as the new “Yassar Arafat,” the “man without a country,” said to be fleeing from one recording studio and one 5 star hotel to another, inches ahead of the CIA and MI-6. We know about Arafat also. One of my friends used to fly him. He did so as a Lt. Col. in the United States Air Force. Why did the world’s greatest terrorist leader have an American plane at his disposal? Oh how we lie, oh how we build those strawmen.
You’ve heard stories about Osama bin Laden being on dyalisis in an American hospital? I wonder if the Air Force was flying him too?
Assange is a strawman, he exists but is he Wikileaks?
The idea of a rather feminine looking young man who is said to receive secret material from an openly gay young American soldier isn’t good marketing. “Gay” doesn’t sell in today’s “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” (DADT) world. Assange had to be reborn and what better guise than as a vicious rapist.
When American women look on Assange, the idea of following him to a hotel room or being raped seems a bit unlikely. Selling Assange as a “masher,” or “date rape” suspect with “on again/off again” criminal charges should have raised suspicions with the press. Funny thing, the press seems to take it all in, this new improved Assange, the potential sex criminal, the heterosexual animal preying on Swedish women, a nation famed for its passive and demure women. It would be a better than average guess that the average female highschool student in Sweden could beat Assange in arm wrestling.
I think I have a new reality show here. Consider this a copyright.
This new Assange, serial rapist, “Yassar Arafat” clone, this one is selling better. What was once seen as feminine and even creepy can now be seen as sinister and dangerous. Women can now buy in. Assange is now a “bad boy.” Maybe we can have Ken O’Keefe give him some “man up” lessons and get him some ink.
While all this drama goes on, quietly, behind the scenes in an American courtroom, those paid to note such things are learning that Wikileaks is actually not a “star crossed” gay lover at all but a group of Israeli citizens, highly paid, heavily protected, working at the highest levels of American government, working for the State of Israel. Former AIPAC employee, Steve Rosen, listed on the indictment below, is now offering evidence of a massive and continuing spy operation, one accessing, well, Wikileak data among other things.
If Languages do not appear in boxes, put cursor over box
Welcome to those Readers
outside of the U.S.. Please
use the Google Application above.